See all schools in Manchester
William Hulme's Grammar School
Primary · Academy · Manchester
"I wish I knew about this website when I was about to choose School"
Lisa, parent
"Finally, one can access the opinions of other students completely transparently."
Fredrik, student
Get access to exclusive content, available only on SchoolParrot!
1 month
£2.99
First month. Then £4.99 / month
1 year
£19
Best valueFirst year. Then £39 / year.
For Schools and school staff
Do you work as a principal or school staff? Take control of your SchoolParrot profile. Click here
Decent School But Slightly Lacking
Pretty average school for average results, despite the name "Grammar" it is not a grammar school. The school has been frankly facing a negative downward spiral of GCSE and A level results especially after its purchase by United Learning (UL), but is still a slightly competitive school.
A total disgrace!!!
My time at this institution has been, quite frankly, disheartening and unacceptable by any reasonable educational standard. While I acknowledge that no school is perfect, the sheer volume of structural, academic, and administrative shortcomings at this establishment demands serious scrutiny. For the benefit of prospective parents and students, I feel it is my responsibility to present an honest and thorough account of the many issues that plague this school.
Education & Learning — 1 Star (Poor)
The academic provision here is utterly deficient. Lessons lack clarity, structure, and consistency. The curriculum feels outdated and uninspired, with minimal differentiation or support for diverse learning needs. There is an alarming absence of intellectual challenge, creativity, or critical thinking development. Students are too often left to their own devices, with little meaningful engagement or feedback from staff. The classroom environment rarely inspires confidence in the school’s commitment to actual learning.
Staff & Teachers — 1 Star (Bad)
The quality of teaching and professionalism among the staff is among the worst I have encountered. A number of teachers appear disengaged, demoralized, or wholly unprepared. Communication with students ranges from apathetic to dismissive, and there is a distinct lack of pastoral care. Some staff members display little interest in student progress, and disciplinary standards vary wildly from one classroom to another. It is a setting where mediocrity is tolerated and excellence is neither expected nor pursued.
Safety & Security — 4 Stars (Great)
To the school’s credit, safety and basic physical security are taken seriously. Entry points are monitored, and incidents of serious harm or misconduct appear to be rare. However, this is a small consolation in an environment where students may be intellectually neglected despite being physically protected.
Indoor Environment — 2 Stars (Poor)
The physical condition of the building leaves much to be desired. Classrooms are often poorly ventilated, insufficiently cleaned, and ill-equipped with modern technology. Several learning spaces are visually uninspiring and suffer from maintenance issues that never seem to be addressed. The entire environment lacks warmth, comfort, or a sense of academic purpose.
Outdoor Environment — 2 Stars (Poor)
Outdoor areas are severely underutilized and appear to be neglected. The grounds are barren and uninspiring, offering little in the way of recreational value or outdoor learning opportunities. There is a distinct absence of greenery, seating, or meaningful playground design. For a school that should be promoting health, movement, and nature-connected learning, the outdoor facilities are nothing short of a disappointment.
Food & Meals — 1 Star (Bad)
The catering provision is genuinely abysmal. Meals lack nutritional value, variety, and basic appeal. Food often arrives lukewarm, tasteless, and portioned in a manner that suggests quantity is prioritized over quality. Several students have reported feeling unwell after school lunches, and many choose to skip meals altogether due to the poor standard.
School Information — 3 Stars (Average)
Basic administrative communication is passable but uninspiring. Parents are occasionally informed of relevant events or changes, but there is little transparency or consistency in messaging. Efforts to involve families in the educational process are minimal, and feedback loops feel one-sided. Overall, the school’s communication culture is functional at best but often perfunctory and uninviting.
Activities — 2 Stars (Poor)
Extracurricular opportunities are scarce, irregular, and poorly advertised. Students are offered few chances to explore new interests or talents outside the classroom. Clubs and activities, when they exist, are underfunded and short-lived. There is no coherent enrichment strategy, and the broader developmental needs of students are consistently overlooked.
⸻
Conclusion
This school is in urgent need of leadership, investment, and vision. Students deserve better — not only in terms of education but also in the environment in which they grow, socialize, and prepare for the future. As it stands, this institution risks doing more harm than good to those enrolled within its walls. I strongly advise any prospective parent or guardian to explore alternative options unless meaningful reforms are implemented.
Education & Learning — 1 Star (Poor)
The academic provision here is utterly deficient. Lessons lack clarity, structure, and consistency. The curriculum feels outdated and uninspired, with minimal differentiation or support for diverse learning needs. There is an alarming absence of intellectual challenge, creativity, or critical thinking development. Students are too often left to their own devices, with little meaningful engagement or feedback from staff. The classroom environment rarely inspires confidence in the school’s commitment to actual learning.
Staff & Teachers — 1 Star (Bad)
The quality of teaching and professionalism among the staff is among the worst I have encountered. A number of teachers appear disengaged, demoralized, or wholly unprepared. Communication with students ranges from apathetic to dismissive, and there is a distinct lack of pastoral care. Some staff members display little interest in student progress, and disciplinary standards vary wildly from one classroom to another. It is a setting where mediocrity is tolerated and excellence is neither expected nor pursued.
Safety & Security — 4 Stars (Great)
To the school’s credit, safety and basic physical security are taken seriously. Entry points are monitored, and incidents of serious harm or misconduct appear to be rare. However, this is a small consolation in an environment where students may be intellectually neglected despite being physically protected.
Indoor Environment — 2 Stars (Poor)
The physical condition of the building leaves much to be desired. Classrooms are often poorly ventilated, insufficiently cleaned, and ill-equipped with modern technology. Several learning spaces are visually uninspiring and suffer from maintenance issues that never seem to be addressed. The entire environment lacks warmth, comfort, or a sense of academic purpose.
Outdoor Environment — 2 Stars (Poor)
Outdoor areas are severely underutilized and appear to be neglected. The grounds are barren and uninspiring, offering little in the way of recreational value or outdoor learning opportunities. There is a distinct absence of greenery, seating, or meaningful playground design. For a school that should be promoting health, movement, and nature-connected learning, the outdoor facilities are nothing short of a disappointment.
Food & Meals — 1 Star (Bad)
The catering provision is genuinely abysmal. Meals lack nutritional value, variety, and basic appeal. Food often arrives lukewarm, tasteless, and portioned in a manner that suggests quantity is prioritized over quality. Several students have reported feeling unwell after school lunches, and many choose to skip meals altogether due to the poor standard.
School Information — 3 Stars (Average)
Basic administrative communication is passable but uninspiring. Parents are occasionally informed of relevant events or changes, but there is little transparency or consistency in messaging. Efforts to involve families in the educational process are minimal, and feedback loops feel one-sided. Overall, the school’s communication culture is functional at best but often perfunctory and uninviting.
Activities — 2 Stars (Poor)
Extracurricular opportunities are scarce, irregular, and poorly advertised. Students are offered few chances to explore new interests or talents outside the classroom. Clubs and activities, when they exist, are underfunded and short-lived. There is no coherent enrichment strategy, and the broader developmental needs of students are consistently overlooked.
⸻
Conclusion
This school is in urgent need of leadership, investment, and vision. Students deserve better — not only in terms of education but also in the environment in which they grow, socialize, and prepare for the future. As it stands, this institution risks doing more harm than good to those enrolled within its walls. I strongly advise any prospective parent or guardian to explore alternative options unless meaningful reforms are implemented.
What the....its fabtastic
So first, I'm genuinely impressed on how they portrayed the school. I have seen some alarming reports, like cigarettes and fights but, it's secondary school. The amount of children who decide to do this, why you blaming the school. The relationship between peers are fabulous, I went to the open evening, I was impressed, outside a student was studying, a teacher was being friendly. So listen to me, William Hulme isn't that bad, I am a little scared about the reviews but, listen it's going to change. Just be careful and try put other schools as options, dont choose one school, choose multiple.
High quality education. Attempted discipline. It's ok.
Most the teachers are dedicated but have questionable methods. A variety of teachers punish falsely and when the class retaliates or someone claims the fault in place of the wrongly accused student the teachers ignore it. Cigarettes found on the floor of the bathroom. Numerous teachers try but is struggling with the masses of violent students. Fights seem to be a ritual.
It provides the education needed to pass GCSE with flying colours but generally only for those who show effort.
Canteen food is overpriced and expensive for the quality and health. £2 for a stale piece of bread and a cold burger.
I recommend if you are willing to take the risk of being beaten up quite badly or lack of comfort for high level GCSE.
Note:
I do not have experience with primary, nursery or 6th form.
United Learning does not have much care for learning due to incorrect answer sheets and typos in PowerPoints which hinders learning as sometimes the meaning changed entirely.
There is at least one teacher in every subject who tries their hardest to teach to the best of their abilities but others are quite average.
It provides the education needed to pass GCSE with flying colours but generally only for those who show effort.
Canteen food is overpriced and expensive for the quality and health. £2 for a stale piece of bread and a cold burger.
I recommend if you are willing to take the risk of being beaten up quite badly or lack of comfort for high level GCSE.
Note:
I do not have experience with primary, nursery or 6th form.
United Learning does not have much care for learning due to incorrect answer sheets and typos in PowerPoints which hinders learning as sometimes the meaning changed entirely.
There is at least one teacher in every subject who tries their hardest to teach to the best of their abilities but others are quite average.
William Hulme
It’s a school that teaches you. I mean what more could you ask for?
An Okay school
It's a good school, with good education, lovely teachers and many great students.
About SchoolParrot
- SchoolParrot is a review site for schools. We are a company that believes in more transparency within schools. Our platform is open to all users.
Read about SchoolParrot and our company - Reviews are published in real-time without moderation and we want to encourage our users to provide constructive feedback and keep a serious tone. The responsibility lies with the user.
Read our review guidelines