Reviews

2.5
Based on 1 reviews and 9 answers
0
0
0
0
0
"I wish I knew about this website when I was about to choose School"
Lisa, parent
"Finally, one can access the opinions of other students completely transparently."
Fredrik, student
Get access to exclusive content, available only on SchoolParrot!
1 month
£2.99
First month. Then £4.99 / month
1 year
£19
Best valueFirst year. Then £39 / year.

For Schools and school staff

Do you work as a principal or school staff? Take control of your SchoolParrot profile. Click here
Former Student
Jun 13, 2023

Worst Independent School in London - Don't waste your money

Despite this being a private school, I wouldn't recommend it to anyone looking to get into highly competitive courses/Oxbridge. Academically intelligent students don't get the 1-1 support they need, and the teachers are a bit too laid back. They don't prepare you for your exams at all, and my teachers weren't even able to finish the syllabus in time due to there slow-paced lessons. As someone who wanted to initially get into Engineering/Medicine, I was forced to take a gap year because I didn't feel prepared enough. In my mocks I was getting C/D's, however, in my actual exams I got A*s as I had to spend my entire half terms/summers catching up on lost work. Other than academics, there's also a massive social problem. Most of the girls are stuck up and very judgemental. If you're not one of them, they leave you out in your face. The only good thing about the school is the food and our holidays. If are very academical and want a good group of friends, I'd recommend selective state or grammar schools.

About SchoolParrot

  • SchoolParrot is a review site for schools. We are a company that believes in more transparency within schools. Our platform is open to all users.
    Read about SchoolParrot and our company
  • Reviews are published in real-time without moderation and we want to encourage our users to provide constructive feedback and keep a serious tone. The responsibility lies with the user.
    Read our review guidelines