Reviews

3.3
Based on 2 reviews and 18 answers
0
0
0
0
0
"I wish I knew about this website when I was about to choose School"
Lisa, parent
"Finally, one can access the opinions of other students completely transparently."
Fredrik, student
Get access to exclusive content, available only on SchoolParrot!
1 month
£2.99
First month. Then £4.99 / month
1 year
£19
Best valueFirst year. Then £39 / year.

For Schools and school staff

Do you work as a principal or school staff? Take control of your SchoolParrot profile. Click here
Student
May 9, 2024

Look no further

The school absolutely smashes other schools out of the water. You will find success in what ever aspect of life you choose to pursue at AGSB. With a rigorous reputation for excellence and the highest regard of character development, AGSB excels at providing the best possible educational environment for a lad. We have some of the best subject specialists from the nation, with Mr Davies coming into the English department a few years ago and completely revolutionising how English is taught, making it interesting and fascinating once again.
Student
Jan 1, 2022

Though very challenging, enjoyed my time!

A lot more challenging than other schools may be a bit overwhelming due to the high academic performance of other students. Ok grades may seem a lot worse than they actually are, however this motivates you to work more. Some teachers are not great, and most of the high academic performance is from the quality of the students selected by the entrance exam rather than the teaching. A good amount of self-revision content can be accessed through Sharepoint.

About SchoolParrot

  • SchoolParrot is a review site for schools. We are a company that believes in more transparency within schools. Our platform is open to all users.
    Read about SchoolParrot and our company
  • Reviews are published in real-time without moderation and we want to encourage our users to provide constructive feedback and keep a serious tone. The responsibility lies with the user.
    Read our review guidelines